Whether trial counsel was ineffective for multiple reasons

No question identified. : oo, Quotas Kesonuted co 1 hsthar Trial Counsel was ineffective fr ro Failing +n, Sect. tp incomblete Tarn iustuctious 6 _ .. a Whelher Teal Counsel Frilina to oltoct ty the Alibi aud Frineifal Kart Trsshrackionss bcivs cead me ectwe assistinee of trial Coumsel 2 0 nL. Whether Teal Counsal Failing tn obTect too he nont-aPhlicalale Priucifhl Tactuctions being teed Ae Ane, ier Constibuches tmaffactive Aral Counsel ¢ we whether Thal Couusel Aailing -p obTéch tthe lon af blicable verdict Form coustbctes incledue a Arial Counsel? rs Ww hedlur Tiel Counsel Milius A obtact ho” he Charting information alarinta Subsaduant | Sagas of trial constices iwofhedve ial Gounsel 2 . cues a oo ne | ee vice ees tu won fo co coue tue to unniun es | \ Wi sbuhether Thal Counsel wis imePhective A ailing Ay obleet avd move Sa mistrial oo. When oe sted "Zan we Uveut whe was ro Fhe dus fawn at Heo sconea cesisteved ty? Wi Whether TWial Counsel Friling A obNat b . 7 the Tien. being given avd Sarina a Cola b __ wo the Unde Ambouded . charsing Inttonmatiis which. a i ditted charia of "Possassion. of Frenne a Convicded Palos." conctitctos inafbective. Aral douwsel to vit) Whether Trial Counsel failing 4a coil, invest — iaate, oleese, and indervions twa wihvesses, ae 7 con Stctes infective trial comsel 2 | . wt | Whothor Tial Counsel. failure. to Crone. oo fn Arial Constihdlas imablective Arial Counsel 2 | , LA ChaPlotl, Hon Shor QolstorUs. Distt Vudeo 4 lHorlatt, Souta RoslucllAsst Attain Caueral die Cardin Vabica W~ Asst Atanas Conere | 5/Melat, vow. Mae chard — U.S, Madictaate, \udgo LlMeCreacs, Taree Teal AVrocuo4 4. Wromenichuker, Leo Corssal at Sonrbeulind | Gl Maceus, Andros P-“Wial Cabo Aten Qi Kauttrnant, Ariat. Trial State AMoraen , io) Giambalve, Ain — DA Kobk Defeada, LThomlsenu , ames Trial Judge | ni Gtotwlock, Mark A.Cineuit Court Xudao ible of Contacts Crate. Disclosure Molement— ii _ 7 Table of Wulhoritie Cited—_ vp vi oe ‘fe Ga Tocisdtiet — vi a Couctiblieaal Meuisions — zy ne hn es a et nnn en — Comelusions —— 20 — Weclaretian of Gowied —— 2 : a I a Pa , too | \_ Burrennnty. Shrbe U4 se, 24 8 (tid) Meaney, Stare 1 sont 504A MM Isr DEA oot) — Le | Masala, Sake Sod ta, rs (a AEP ood De too} — [_Shuler. Sie fot Ud toss (Ae AA Lor 064 Dowl) — Masts v. Stake 9007 $014 M18 CAAAM Nor ben Ve — Fy IS | heats use 43.50.24 ALAA AE tad A ow)—— | ___—Clus aloussotend 44 Sick Aflo (Uis.Ore 147) —— 4 [ Batsay. Cred ae € Ste 13 1180(Le.ty cali tou) | __lalde w. Site, 190 So, 1d yr (Aa AAP TCA St wo) __ Sidlland v, Wadlanuehas, Wel Us. ioe (1489) — 1709 |_ilacelv. fall sus. 89.14 Soto lt) — (1,15. ) Slack vs Metnaial, $24 U6 425, 110 S.Ct 1595 (2000) — II, IS _ Paedarw, Site 904 50.4 970(Fls, roo) IE _ eecaua. Stthe, 17 $0.24 211(Fla,A€2 oa DCA apoio} ID of Hear, Ste, Fla Le Wile SM ogy — IE antec, Stabe 18 0.24 tos Al ACC Hed De oo!) — 14 Traviata tle, 199 Sch. MUL MOL Gol) — IG AK Waeor Rata, 12 S.C, 1809, 1818 (2rd) — Mo, 11,1 _ Piaweilv Couthrad, S40 6 tnd 998, 949 (Er Cir, (IAQ) — 14 usted Stobes vs Easter, 588 Fd bi, Lol BMH Ce (mg—l4 a _ Beders [ Meus Florida Veale Ven po nn ae nee ee nN RE oH wh NR ne nee aman te mea en mt Hm . Aakle nf Aba idioos Aiadiv-AU.S. Court of MPMals clevewth Cnet [dewial of AbPlication o€ Cockbeate of Afbalabsl; Folbwars bo 201g. APlauidiv-Ats. Rout Afbals Eleventh. Circuit clomial af Motion fra Rorancidocabion Afil Ly Lolg Abtonidiv-C~ uc. District Court Middle District of Florida dowial of 22 U6, 8 2154 Potition Ae Wri ‘of Laos ofc Februars 10M. NPhonidiv-DSecond Nitric Couct of APmls bilad Amdocs Dreiok ani dicock aml Ausush to, 100, [alPrnidiv-E Sarid Niteid Couch of AtPoals Maw dato mn divack aPloul Cobbinlosr ¥ toll, Caso LNOA29749 Alba wdiv-F -ThanHoth Vudicwl Circuit, Tuefectue Cal Counsel, AKSD, May BL 207 | Afbosdiv Co Tuonti oth Tadic Ciccu AOnriz of 4.xcp Sofbonrtor 24 2al ; Atl d: He \otoucs ACA ak Flomda clonal af ast. . conitictiod Ralwarasa Nectnbor to, Dor, | Aff, AnTL -~ S