No. 18-6049
Robert Wallace Smith v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: child-pornography criminal-sentencing due-process first-offender internet-crime sentencing-guidelines statutory-maximum substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-10-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's statutory maximum, 240-month sentence is substantively unreasonable for a first offender convicted of one count of receiving or distributing child pornography through the internet
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the district court’s statutory maximum, 240-month sentence is substantively unreasonable for a first offender convicted of one count of receiving or distributing child pornography through the internet. i
Docket Entries
2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 22, 2018)
Attorneys
Robert Smith
John Paul Balazs — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
John Paul Balazs — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent