Is Petitioner Boone serving an unlawful/void sentence because it is a Substantive-Due-Process, Double-Jeopardy violation for a defendant to be punished twice in the same trial, on the same facts, for the same statutory offense; first by a jury, and a second time by the Judge to increase that jury's punishment?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , QUESTION GNE: Is Petitioner Boone serving an unlawful/void sentence because it is a Substantive Due Process, Double Jeopardy violation for a defendant to be punished : twice in the same trial, on the same facts, for the same statutory offense; first by a jury, and a second time by the Judge to increase that jury's punishment? : QUESTION TWO: Is it incumbent upon the U.S. Supreme Court to correct a State sentence that was unlawfully imposed violating Substantive Due Process and Double Jeopardy, when State and Federal Courts failed to address the issue on the merits citing A.E.D.P.A. statute of limitations, while disregarding the Supreme Court's ruling in, MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANNA, 136 S.Ct. 718(2016), which states: "State and Federal courts have no authority to leave in place a conviction or ‘sentence! . that violates a substantive rule of law regardless of whether the conviction or ‘sentence! became final before the rule was announced?" QUESTION THREE: Is it an unconstitutional Seperation of Power violation for Congress to legislate a statute of limitations as in 28 U.S.C. §2244(d)(1) to defeat constitutional Substantive Due Process law, Double Jeopardy, and Actual Innocence? Tl.