Whether the appropriate standard of review for a sentence following the revocation of supervised release is the plainly unreasonable' standard or the 'reasonableness' standard

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the appropriate standard of review for a sentence following the revocation of supervised release is the “plainly unreasonable” standard once found in 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e) or the “reasonableness” standard announced by this Court in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 2. Whether it was unreasonable (or plainly so) for the district court to impose an eighteen-month revocation sentence on a defendant who was originally incorrectly classified for sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), without any consideration of the time that defendant had overserved due to that erroneous designation.