Does a trial court have the right to prosecute a scientist for forward-thinking science?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Introduction This case is about a renegade trial court. A wide-umbrella question reflective of the case reads: “Js it a trial court or a lawless kingdom?’ However, the historic rulings by Third Circuit Court of Davidson County, Tennessee in 2015 are best understood through the following interrelated questions that are selected from a pool of many others. I. Does a trial court have any rights to prosecute a scientist, in reminiscence of Galileo’s prosecution, for his/her forward-thinking science when the science even has the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF)? II. Has citizen’s rights been violated when a court puts a citizen under duress (i.e. threatens the citizen with jail) to force the citizen to sign off his/her property at a price that is proven to be less than the fair market value of the property? II. When a court overrules all existing Laws/Codes/Prior Cases by classifying the entrepreneurial activities of an inventor in producing/marketing his /her awardwinning inventions as asset dissipation, has that court overstepped its bounds into becoming a lawmaker? IV. When a court ignores and/or modifies evidences in order to mold a case into ; having an outcome desired by the court, has the court, at the minimum, violated citizen’s right to a fair trial?