No. 18-6076

Wilton Eugene Sandifer, Sr. v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2018-09-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 4th-amendment 6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidence-law mandamus standing state-court third-party-guilt trial-rights
Latest Conference: 2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner was denied due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment by the state court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus without proper consideration of the issues presented

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : ) 7s We Subhene Cover oF Fae uditeh STAPES Periried Fak kit oF CxeTieRAei Pastitrenarespead A l/g preqs Yao a weir ba low . Fh o bralon oy’ TF oe 4e hes! SVo%e Oaurr Yo fevlew Vso nor tS ops ay ppt Fhe —lar'shictien oY YZ.s our? 7S, ravelkad udder F¥/aTP SZ SH ts") (a) | ) Codsrizutioshc ANS Sine rok : PRaVisiedS sN voeved eee INVOLVED Pilienax~ has hoon i paheront rlaats eonde~ V¥ha Blowing: Yio tons una dor SH rhele— AL § QZ OC foresea_ eee eH SO /anrd QZ 43. Lenstitntren ba—-Swaoe, So i s\ FiotihA and ssbindd. Vio leViens anda” ee ne Ova, ‘a fama / ov aS fon Yer (atlress oY Q*revenea_ Poteaecien Prom cen laasono bla. Senergh ond proreetien 7 I Ol Seek Ore Seizele— W2e ba Seenran io “Weain persons ea low ~n 1 Wealtfany S/eSenY want, A Aree Se (s) Vio ation (sy ov Col me PI Vion of Oftusa. Pe NOVO Gf OS bu SO ° Gn hk Baa Bfeoress of /oex) . a re Doren f See (e\ Denie/ ov Liakt Yo ju “Vriel(s) (4 . S35/ 0% a, Choma a. [4 [8lab-~ OF . . Zz. — Wnard nen) Eins (*) OM wal is\ Srnve oF Feats A owns ; : oY Prellas. re Wi tan A mon kh imtaan an [00S ay VAw Marlak Syo7es . DPonro/ av tops advukasvien | Opp) e070 oV! Aobaes CZorkes unde Ark (§ 9 Chusea Z oF “Via_ £4.53. on sfc far ior and ven hoo : Fivla EF use zz¢4 , See Case. No. . Aske DSJade ara Seu7v4 fDonrdK Dursaa | Czusa. Dunborm 4 , STATEMENT oF FE C4HSE PATH one hes boon Denial of A /1 Ca Mor fore Q weit oV mMonbomus aa) Bee Fx. Su prome Cour wi Vhour prope fae en) Ard fies Hono Prvivesaer a// fa~-tress ~K Vea PSSHe(s) (bisa fa aa Jad Sal sa¥pabiflea 2 11 Oa KfeeW Fro Aron Vas DSTAFTE oF Fu2oktsA A ond Aas : poor tetl S Lata te foud MeL Va | Qen(Vaemant 6a SNbIANA, ParleVre10~ Hes mee e7 62M ess 1a Vio. a a VYemus(\ (4 Frosh A anol fa Vk Chui Pod Extotes )isbriot (but avrTien Distrred of Inchione ~~ “ete dua/, Pas) fnrne conden ve Ay wo darnesY faved Y o// /ssue(s) as pr sented %~ Veo: Pasos Cirent Court, Zod Di <¥, QrurV oW’ poe! s an fh Va Busvena. Lour% FaokidfA ; Caso . ek); 14 ORbCLCF Zdih-RdoR ~ Sash | , MEASoSS Fol GRASTING OF WAIT Fha— Jaws oY Tau Lf at Vag Breves , Se (nwlada— Yha. +1.:3. Conard! Foon , and VY%a. BArll or Aihi’s (08 feoVULy frrad Yo ba, mela, Vio. ae o (Ye fkoas pein“ pa YAs. mada, Far. Sula. of : Ness or” c S here¥ras gn dD YHa_ Abed WGo¥ Bue 6 Sow & 07 OL bang Q' bre Sa CV en Po VoKie re fax Qer dn Aeron LR” x Jie ~ a) and all oF erne-(5) atucl! 20 V%acbl pe pela. eo VA ter Il'S Bevin fa ling APoved Fabra, (be. Lor? SayA2091 . ° Ya porta MeVions of o Y#as ; pa udst We lieth Ora fevoby , oo Aonicd , ado Metreoa Spr Litee? ag . Ao fg Jona le) PRIS Cau F. . Ss. . ) As Yaa Fuss Kon oY VFaohh> 7 (aoe da “fears 4 DSYetea_ 4os TP ; CER (¥se/¥% cfhoas ao¥ Spr (Qt, AxHxMtes5; VHe /Ssuva_. a Komitee Le Ln cliana FI US 144, eT Say, /8eo (/955) A® Suck Vha_ guasY/on Aas oY bo | — Lesalved 44 YB°s Oour?. “Where o harvon . Jes 2 BaYensa, Yo 24 7radVor | Le Coury! Aes Fuld Ya Vaea. parermnarveoa 2 Yaa Dewan hing Katee, (InhMiana) Was ant lad 5 Sy "Sn Yurth and erhil” anto~ WF ae by US Garst., Aowede” hava. Vaera— ‘a @ eva Vroversa whvie~ Va a fevictes! ww hosa optrah: Hea “Ss fag wesTad os Fao rua. ard fowlt/ person , ad WheT er Yao. Mn oumanVs wera +2 ords~ wer~ar © B29 F Sepp. Soy (d. A41973) ond ae FBG 102% (hI Lr, 790) We 2 erm pnal Ban hany 44s G2 sanherenY CAT ye priv Bis fewuelSy bbac Py ; Bi eel/a presen? ay soerg Blea oy” Y#o— . Friel precasdiaas agen Ain, (See) — Trial ‘faeordh uf. (Foe CF —~ Pirates Louw, la. ‘ ; , Fler da Ondk Pn tea— Vv, —Yehasvor , B34 | MS “Zee , ZEST; BY Sav ro¥9 (992) Cpo%eag VasY 0 Beate nMenY hex YA 2 bensyti futen a/ Plog ative av bang pre sant fa prose ay Qneh% =; alt (CanvV Svoas— DY Vee Crinsla ed Vobog | proscentiody , (Sex) e/soj Pol v. Krom berh, BID FLA forts, sot nl. (H* Gurr L99") (Sac) Fool faeards ja Qausa. No(s) /Y-/RL6-0e 2F ; Zh): 2483 ant S@sh2291 fa spectively, a The 3fola 70 Florida Supreme Cour? — fis shows 0 Vhin bE AixAarn Yor peasy tie nam Boe ~b Vou. Va W oY Jerre Q ‘bre

Docket Entries

2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2018-04-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2018)

Attorneys

State of Florida
C. Todd ChapmanFlorida Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
C. Todd ChapmanFlorida Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Wilton Eugene Sandifer
Wilton Eugene Sandifer Sr. — Petitioner
Wilton Eugene Sandifer Sr. — Petitioner