No. 18-6082
Jeffrey Eugene Lee v. R. C. Cheatham, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: betterman-v-montana braden-v-kentucky civil-rights constitutional-claim constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus judicial-circuit sentencing sentencing-obligation speedy-trial state-constitutional-obligations state-obligations state-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in rejecting the petitioner's claim under Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit of Kentucky and Betterman v. Montana
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS BELOW ERRED IN REJECTING THE _ PETITIONER'S CLAIM UNDER BRADEN V. 30th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT _.° OF KENTUCKY, 410U.S. 484 (1973) and Betterman v. Montana, — 136 U.S. 1609 (2016), HE WAS ENTITLED TO ENFORCE THE STATE OF FLORIDA'S AFFIRMATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION TO SENTENCE HIM, IT HAS REFUSED TO DO SO FOR 26 YEARS ?
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-01
Waiver of right of respondent R.C. Cheatham, Warden to respond filed.
2018-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2018)
Attorneys
Jeffrey Lee
Jeffrey Eugene Lee — Petitioner
R.C. Cheatham, Warden
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent