No. 18-6093

Brian Tate v. Maryland

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2018-09-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights developmental-capacity diminished-capacity due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment guilty-plea juvenile-defendant juvenile-justice maryland-rule-4-242(c) mental-illness
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause requires a state court to conduct an inquiry on the record into the effects of a juvenile defendant's age, mental health, and developmental characteristics on the voluntariness of his guilty plea

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 7 Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, and MARYLAND RULE 4-242(c), requires a state court, before accepting a guilty plea from a juvenile defendant suffering from diminished capacity due to mentally illness, to conduct an enquiry on the record into the specific effects that the juvenile's age, mental health, and developmental characteristics have had on the voluntariness : of his decision to plead guilty — with a focus on age as the crucial factor. ;

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-11-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2018-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Brian Tate
Brian Tate — Petitioner
Brian Tate — Petitioner
Maryland
Carrie J. WilliamsOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Carrie J. WilliamsOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent