No. 18-6094
Edgar Leopoldo Garcia-Martinez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland confidential-informant dea discovery drug-conspiracy due-process expert-testimony false-swearing irs prosecutorial-misconduct ssa
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Immigration Privacy
DueProcess Securities Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-11-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the prosecution required to supply information concerning the failure to report income to the IRS and the SSA by the DEA and its confidential informant?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Under Brady v. Maryland, is the prosecution and the DEA required to supply information concerning the failure to report income to the IRS and the SSA by the DEA and its confidential informant since the failure to report is an act of false swearing? Under F.R.E. 704(b), may the lead case agent for the DEA render an expert opinion in a drug conspiracy case that an accused person was a witting participant in the crimes charged? i
Docket Entries
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2018)
Attorneys
Edgar Leopoldo Garcia MArtinez
Jonathan S. Willett — Law Offices of JSW, Petitioner
Jonathan S. Willett — Law Offices of JSW, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent