No. 18-6098
Response RequestedRelisted (5)IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction federal-subject-matter-jurisdiction indian-country indian-law major-crimes-act organic-act prospective-decisions seminole-country seminole-tribe state-waiver-rule subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-07-08
(distributed 5 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court clearly established the prospective decisions that Seminole Country written in Congress Organic Act invokes the Major Crimes Act?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Q. WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT CLEARLY ESTABLISHED THE PROSPECTIVE DECISIONS THAT SEMINOLE COUNTRY WRITTEN IN CONGRESS ORGANIC ACT INVOKES THE MAJOR CRIMES ACT ? Q. WHETHER OKLAHOMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLICATION OF STATE WAIVER RULE AS A PROCEDURAL BAR IS ADEQUATE TO BAR REVIEW OF FEDERAL SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF MAJOR CRIME ACTS ENUMERATED IN 1151,1153 TITLE 18 USCA COMMITTED BY INDIAN WITHIN INDIAN COUNTRY ? ii
Docket Entries
2020-08-10
MANDATE ISSUED.
2020-08-10
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-07-09
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>McGirt</i> v. <i>Oklahoma</i>, 591 U. S. ___ (2020).
2020-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/8/2020.
2019-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019..
2019-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-09
Reply of petitioner Joe Johnson filed. (Distributed)
2019-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-12-14
Brief of respondent Oklahoma in opposition filed.
2018-11-14
Response Requested. (Due December 14, 2018)
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2018)
Attorneys
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent