No. 18-6099

In Re Terry Margheim

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-09-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 due-process judicial-administration judicial-integrity judicial-process stare-decisis supervisory-authority
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When the courts below violate due process by denying a meaningful opportunity to be heard in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, will the United States Supreme Court act in its supervisory authority to ensure proper judicial administration and restore integrity of the judicial process?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED When the courts below violate due process by denying a meaningful opportunity to be heard in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, will the United States Supreme Court act in its supervisory authority to ensure proper judicial administration and restore integrity of the judicial process? Is Stare Decisis a doctrine of convenience? iii

Docket Entries

2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-10-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-05
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2018)

Attorneys

Terry Margheim
Terry Margheim — Petitioner
Terry Margheim — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent