Whether the Seventh Circuit contravened Stinson v. United States when it relied on guideline commentary inconsistent with 18 U.S.C. § 16

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The district court enhanced Pliego-Hernandez’ sentencing guideline range on the strength of a prior conviction for attempted robbery. Nothing in the text of the relevant guideline supported that result, but the Seventh Circuit concluded that the guideline commentary could supply the missing content. Did the Seventh Circuit contravene Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36 (1993) when it relied on guideline commentary inconsistent with 18 U.S.C. § 16? i