Gregory D. Kilpatrick v. Leslie M. Arp
Whether the petitioner's 1307 and 1306 forms violate the 5th Amendment's due process clause and the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Ky79/3P-A a fe WI) PIESIPT /630Y AND [F300 fFPELENDITIA ft ; 70 3G ae goTetibaroty Gori VINEM C7 FLY "B0rs AND NOVEMBGLOS, WIS. © diy DES Tf 3bY Ab ld 300 NEVE [7 31b Ay W030 RHE HE PETECTOE (iby MH ERA IWHT IneD 3b 1630Y AW [4300 VIQLLTE. F?0 SE-LVAINTHTS, OY OO lular ® | Ae Wty Dibw 7 1f 307 AW 1E30€ Vl OW FELIEVING: THE CASI, HSV. SQUVAMIVE ELL ATHIAL, Awl VtIE p1VEW®, BY METAS To THE ATTENTION OF THE UE. DEAL. ULSHALS SO hiliy b COULD FSSVE SYMH Ons ES yp fee Ee: 3) AWS 7 PIETTOVSO/3)) J ey AE 16304 Atty 18 50b feipeuin ALIS finh VORITIEM FES NWON-ERLIDOITE pI fi LO / ea file. 7 S23 Ab YF Wve aia b— Wik) beESN?T 1304 Avs IL Monry ES CLLLD) 2 59 2-180 SVE ASTO U“ny freLE fPALINTI EE TF Ut BAR the ont leptin ep deepak e. 1 Wits 16 pb30Y Awh 16306 LAMIVE [fF 3A CTR b¢ Awd [7TY3G & _ : = uy 1% /k30/ Awbd /f306 shying lr Ef UMS 9 e Whe “y (alec d GE sek jose WSL ly 0035 bub 39/5 CELA) Why NEW YOIE (C032. Ve le oI 1, ( cer sbipion TO AUMEST /V318f LW Aith 1¢302 fLOTIGNE SCCLLLEIT WITH 7 i Oe beak eedge fe / (ager, 3 s pesmi GBPS fRALINTT ad Di ET : >> , Questions feEsen rep (Covrinvey) > J0Wity Are fF 30Y Ars /€306 WHEM EC ebgssiry As Lersous foe AN EVIL PURSE LOW Wipf , YN AOLEMENT Aw (7. Mop of Cages: fowl (24 1g CTE ON fie 82 ~LONTT , THT (& (EWING S We UBS ME SE 0AM) ERE SV oerintc LETILED,. Aivd MEME Line 0 the ABE? Ie WIA) biprO7 [4384 hth (F306 flop flo-Sé 7 : Uy ee TWET, PELLET [O48 ADPILTO Said bug Lots ALE STATE PONT fs WET TBEY Fae ngs P \ . me | “