No. 18-6131

Gregory D. Kilpatrick v. Leslie M. Arp

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2018-09-28
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection government-misconduct standing takings
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's 1307 and 1306 forms violate the 5th Amendment's due process clause and the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Ky79/3P-A a fe WI) PIESIPT /630Y AND [F300 fFPELENDITIA ft ; 70 3G ae goTetibaroty Gori VINEM C7 FLY "B0rs AND NOVEMBGLOS, WIS. © diy DES Tf 3bY Ab ld 300 NEVE [7 31b Ay W030 RHE HE PETECTOE (iby MH ERA IWHT IneD 3b 1630Y AW [4300 VIQLLTE. F?0 SE-LVAINTHTS, OY OO lular ® | Ae Wty Dibw 7 1f 307 AW 1E30€ Vl OW FELIEVING: THE CASI, HSV. SQUVAMIVE ELL ATHIAL, Awl VtIE p1VEW®, BY METAS To THE ATTENTION OF THE UE. DEAL. ULSHALS SO hiliy b COULD FSSVE SYMH Ons ES yp fee Ee: 3) AWS 7 PIETTOVSO/3)) J ey AE 16304 Atty 18 50b feipeuin ALIS finh VORITIEM FES NWON-ERLIDOITE pI fi LO / ea file. 7 S23 Ab YF Wve aia b— Wik) beESN?T 1304 Avs IL Monry ES CLLLD) 2 59 2-180 SVE ASTO U“ny freLE fPALINTI EE TF Ut BAR the ont leptin ep deepak e. 1 Wits 16 pb30Y Awh 16306 LAMIVE [fF 3A CTR b¢ Awd [7TY3G & _ : = uy 1% /k30/ Awbd /f306 shying lr Ef UMS 9 e Whe “y (alec d GE sek jose WSL ly 0035 bub 39/5 CELA) Why NEW YOIE (C032. Ve le oI 1, ( cer sbipion TO AUMEST /V318f LW Aith 1¢302 fLOTIGNE SCCLLLEIT WITH 7 i Oe beak eedge fe / (ager, 3 s pesmi GBPS fRALINTT ad Di ET : >> , Questions feEsen rep (Covrinvey) > J0Wity Are fF 30Y Ars /€306 WHEM EC ebgssiry As Lersous foe AN EVIL PURSE LOW Wipf , YN AOLEMENT Aw (7. Mop of Cages: fowl (24 1g CTE ON fie 82 ~LONTT , THT (& (EWING S We UBS ME SE 0AM) ERE SV oerintc LETILED,. Aivd MEME Line 0 the ABE? Ie WIA) biprO7 [4384 hth (F306 flop flo-Sé 7 : Uy ee TWET, PELLET [O48 ADPILTO Said bug Lots ALE STATE PONT fs WET TBEY Fae ngs P \ . me | “

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2019-04-02
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2018-12-21
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2018-12-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 29, 2018)

Attorneys

Gregory Kilpatrick
Gregory D. Kilpatrick — Petitioner