Whether there is a reasonable probability that the court below would vacate petitioner's conviction, giving the opportunity to consider this Court's decision in Missouri v. Frye, 182 L.Ed.2d 379, 566 U.S. 134 (2012) upon confirming the July 15, 2011 plea offer did not require cooperation and defense counsel failed to inform petitioner of it?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. WHETHER THERE IS A REASONABLE PROBABILITY THAT THE COURT BELOW WOULD VACATE PETITIONER'S CONVICTION, GIVING THE OPPORTUNITY TQ CONSIDER THIS COURT'S DECISION IN MISSOURI V. FRYE, 182 L.Ed.2d 379, 566 U.S. 134 (2012) UPON CONFIRMING THE JULY 15, 2011 PLEA , OFFER DID NOT REQUIRE COQPERATION AND DEFENSE COUNSEL FAILED TO INFORM PETITIONER OF IT? li ; o PARTIES MARLON OLIVER ITS THE PETITIONER, WHO WAS THE DEFENDANT-APPELLANT BELOW. THE UNITED STATES GF AMERICA IS THE RESPONDENT, WHO WAS THE : PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE BELOU. , iii ‘ ‘ TABLE GF CONTENTS . “QUESTIONS PRESENTED. ccc ccc cece cece ce cance een ececeeneld PARTIES. cnc nn ecc cerns ccc carn cence ncescsesceusol di