Whether the U.S. District Court has authority to order the clerk to not file any further pleadings in habeas corpus proceedings, where the order resulted in the court's failure to file a Rule 60(b) motion that attacked a defect in the legality of federal habeas corpus proceedings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Hl WHETHER US. DESTAUCT Count Tubee HAS AUTHOALTY TO ORDER CLERK Fo MoT FILE ANY FURTHER PLEAUINCS ZH HABEAS Conbus PROCEEDINGS , WHERE ORDER RESULTED LA) CouhT'S FALLULE To FILE AM RULE op péririoner's AVE 60 Cb) Morrow CER CVE) THAT ATTACKED A DEFECT qu THE LIEGAITY OF FEDERAL HABENS LoRpus PAocké HiNbS. Oefecr ! . Here, tha Ur5, western bistricr Court peferred fatitenes$ AB USL $A2SY petition to Masistrake under Dg 8c. § 636 (H)LOCB) and Local Rules of US Westen Mistret Court, ard hule #9 of fabess Corpus Rules governing AG OSC. FLasd Cases, The Maststrrts Orderef Naspordent to answer and affer answer was filed bot hetore Moasistrete entered efort and fecommerdation , and hebre Petitioner fd objections of fequest for Certificate of Appealability, phe OS. Pestrict Judge tatervened ord Ordered SAISY habexs petition fe dismigsed ancl thet COA be dered aad Ehet Clerk shell not fila any further pleadings sn’ this Cefe other than Notice of appecl ; . Petitionss Rule 60CH) meting hes ot Boer Atel or foled efor and Motor to rile vjen Ate Go) mofeora wes . peturped to fatstrenar A.