Should Petitioner Feery's case be reversed and remanded based upon direct evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel in his failure to disclose any and all discovery to Petitioner under Brady?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Onveshon fs.) . Should Pethoner Feery's Case Soul be reversed and feman ded Dased upon direct: evidence of Tnelfechve. Assistance Lounse I. mn Ais fothace +p dschse @ny ana alf Ascovery to PeAhoner uncler Brady? Cheston(2,) Dd Fedhomer Fecry's Fourteenth Amendment Rishts to Due Preeess and Loual protchon Was Violated by Dalice of DeQnse Counsel an Ohi toc ‘ ‘4, ' d Soherte +o provide Fethoner with PERTINENT dscovery e . D,, . Did the Lower Court [icked Sars diction to Convict Pebhoner erry Via a plea of Gulf: hen 1) of Ths dacatry? Phone never Ihod. possession