No. 18-6159

Charlise Williams v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence loss-calculation sentencing sixth-amendment victim-count
Key Terms:
ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-11-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the Petitioners Sixth Amendment right, under the Confrontation Clause violated?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED © ; I. Was the Petitioners Sixth Amendment right, under the Confrontation Clause violated ? II. Was the Petitioners potentially violated Sixth Amendment Right, under the a Confrontation Clause a contributing factor to improper calculation of the total loss amount assessed and was that loss amount supported by evidence as required ? III. Was the Petitioners potentially, violated Sixth Amendment Right, under the ; Confrontation Clause a contributing factor to improper calculation of the total victims and was it factually supported as required ? IV. Was the loss amount improperly calculated, when the total loss assessed was : unrelated to the offense and unsupported by the evidence, as required? V. Was the calculation of the number of victims factually supported by evidence as required ? ; t ve bene

Docket Entries

2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 31, 2018)
2018-08-15
Application (18A165) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 3, 2018.
2018-08-06
Application (18A165) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 4, 2018 to November 3, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Charlise Williams
Charlise Williams — Petitioner
Charlise Williams — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent