What would You do against such jurists, tremendous crimes as the National matter!?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED lf You will be clear at below mention by my petition of 39pages, what would You do against such jurists, tremendous crimes as the National matter!? This section is the contents for “Reason for Granting Petition” together, that | don't have any page from 40. There is no any evidence for guilty in this world, but civil. The prosecutor, McFretidge issued this case to threaten me and as the worst situation as he could( lcharge of 3, against law which dropped without any one augment and bail impossible), to pay by using national facility, jail for his profit, with evidence, only 4documents among 80, which are clearly and 100%, innocent. Jurists threatened me to pay at 15 time, thento sign at guilty, otherwise in jail more than 16,12 or 9years and hid the law of credit for Koran jail period at that time, ev en all jurists must not have any way to know this case, issued weirdly clearly, still | am guilty by keeping such weird alll lies. As the National matter,at such jurists,that You and people must concern, is jurists'lies, too clear weird and irritated, at basic common sense, and clear paradoxical all v erbal evidence against their ev idence, 4documents, as full contents of Decision. Such situation shows jurists hav e not any feeling at their crime at cases, as hardened for the historic. Evenat main issues for “commission and middle person”, occurred at jury court as comedy then Decision changed the content of commission at jury, “by one witness plaintiff said” at international deal for $1.92million. Not only such awfullies “at their sev eral ‘the court live deception shows’, there are professional plots at laws, and main issues of the court. If You see actually, by