No. 18-6173
Carlos Tiznado-Valenzuela v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split federal-procedure federal-sentencing judicial-interpretation molina-martinez molina-martinez-standard plain-error-review prejudice prejudice-prong sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the Court address the division of circuit authority over the Court's application of the prejudice prong of plain-error review in Molina-Martinez v. United States?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should the Court address the division of circuit authority over the Court’s application of the prejudice prong of plain-error review in Molina-Martinez v. United States? --prefix-
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-10-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2018)
Attorneys
Carlos Tiznado-Valenzuela
James Fife — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
James Fife — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent