No. 18-6177

Tony Lipscomb v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-02
Status: GVR
Type: IFP
Relisted (4)IFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act circuit-split illinois-robbery stokeling-v-united-states use-of-force violent-felony
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-02-22 (distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Illinois robbery categorically require the use of force and thereby qualify as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Does Illinois robbery categorically require the use of force and thereby qualify as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act? (This Court has granted certiorari to consider essentially the same question, although the question arose in the context of Florida’s robbery statute. Stokeling v. United States, No. 17-5554, cert. granted April 2, 2018. The Court also has pending petitions raising this issue under the Illinois robbery statute. Klikno v. United States, No. 17-5018, cert. filed June 22, 2017; Van Sach v. United States, No. 17-8740, cert. filed May 31, 2018; and Shields v. United States, No. 17-9399, cert. filed June 12, 2018.) 2. The Seventh Circuit agrees that the Ilinois offense of attempt does not require the use of force. Nonetheless, it has ruled that, when the attempted offense is a violent felony, attempt is itself a violent felony, because that conclusion “makes sense.” Is attempt to commit a violent felony itself a violent felony, even though the elements of attempt do not categorically i require the use of force? (The Court has a pending petition raising this same issue. Hill v. United States, No. 18-5915, cert. filed August 28, 2018.) ii

Docket Entries

2019-03-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-02-25
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED in light of Stokeling v. United States, 586 U. S. ___ (2019).
2019-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-03
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2018-10-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 3, 2018.
2018-10-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 1, 2018 to December 3, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2018)
2018-07-27
Application (18A92) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 1, 2018.
2018-07-18
Application (18A92) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Tony Lipscomb
William H TheisFederal Defender Program, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent