No. 18-6185

Jason Beckman v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2018-10-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: apprendi apprendi-v-new-jersey criminal-procedure due-process fact-finding factfinding jury-factfinding juvenile-sentencing life-sentence miller-factors miller-v-alabama sentencing-factors sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Punishment
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether section 921.1401, Florida Statutes, violates the Sixth Amendment by allowing a judge rather than a jury to conduct the factfinding necessary to sentence a juvenile to life in prison

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Petitioner Jason Beckman, a juvenile at the time of the offense, was convicted of first-degree murder. Because he was a juvenile, he received an individualized sentencing hearing pursuant to section 921.1401, Florida Statutes (2014). This statute required the trial court to consider various factors, such as the nature of the crime, Petitioner’s emotional and mental health at the time of the offense, and the effect of the characteristics attributable to the defendant’s youth on the defendant's judgment. A life sentence could not be imposed on Petitioner absent consideration of these factors. After making findings on the section 921.1401 factors and concluding that “the aggravating circumstances clearly and convincingly outweigh the mitigating factors,” the trial court sentenced Petitioner to life in prison. The question presented is whether section 921.1401, Florida Statutes, violates the Sixth Amendment by allowing a judge rather than a jury to conduct the factfinding necessary to sentence a juvenile to life in prison. i

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-28
Reply of petitioner Jason Beckman filed. (Distributed)
2019-01-14
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2018-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 14, 2019.
2018-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 13, 2018 to January 14, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-13
Response Requested. (Due December 13, 2018)
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2018-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2018)

Attorneys

Florida
Amitabh AgarwalOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Amitabh AgarwalOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Jason Beckman
Maria Elena LauredoLaw Offices of Public Defender Carlos J. Martinez,, Petitioner
Maria Elena LauredoLaw Offices of Public Defender Carlos J. Martinez,, Petitioner