No. 18-6187
Antonio Martinez-Lopez v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-1425 acquisition-of-citizenship citizenship-application criminal-statute false-statement immigration-law judicial-interpretation maslenjak-v-us naturalization naturalization-fraud revocation-of-citizenship
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the appeals court err in affirming petitioner's conviction for unlawful procurement of naturalization
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Did the appeals court err in affirming petitioner's : conviction for unlawful procurement of naturalization pursuant to 18. U.S.C. 1425 based on petitioner's false statement on the oO citizenship application when the Supreme Court determined in : Maslenjak v. U.S., 582 US __. 137 S.ct. __, 198 (Ed 2d 460 (2017) that a false statement on a citizenship application does not meet the criteria for revocation of citizenship unless the illegal act played some role in the acquisition of citizenship. \
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-12-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-11-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 28, 2018.
2018-11-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 28, 2018 to December 28, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-10-29
Response Requested. (Due November 28, 2018)
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2018)
Attorneys
Antonio Martinez-Lopez
Antonio Martinez-Lopez — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent