Andrew Lucero v. Colorado Department of Corrections
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether the original Criminal Trial Court abused its discretion in its Procedural Defaults, ab initio, depriving petitioner of Constitutionally Secured Protections of the Bill of Rights, at federal and state law, and of Statutory provisions consistent therewith, of a liberty interest
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the original Criminal Trial Court abused it's discretion in it's Procedural Defaults, ab initio, depriving petitioner of Constitutionally Secured Protections of the Bill of Rights, at federal and state law, and of Statutory provisions consistant therewith, of a liberty interest.in due process; a jurisdictional question? 2. Whether the Post-Conviction Courts in Habeas Corpus, abused ; their discretion, denied due process on issues presented of a liberty interest in violation of both constitutional and statutory provision, of continued unlawful confinement? . 3. Whether the Colorado State Supreme Court wrongly denied the Petitioner's Original Jurisdiction presentment deemed a Writ of Habeas Corpus due to a miscommunication to petitioner who filed a briefing before time, refusing to compel respondant to answer _; the claim? And denied a Rehearing, timely filed? I