No. 18-6188

Andrew Lucero v. Colorado Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Colorado
Docketed: 2018-10-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bill-of-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdictional-issue liberty-interest procedural-default statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-11-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the original Criminal Trial Court abused its discretion in its Procedural Defaults, ab initio, depriving petitioner of Constitutionally Secured Protections of the Bill of Rights, at federal and state law, and of Statutory provisions consistent therewith, of a liberty interest

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the original Criminal Trial Court abused it's discretion in it's Procedural Defaults, ab initio, depriving petitioner of Constitutionally Secured Protections of the Bill of Rights, at federal and state law, and of Statutory provisions consistant therewith, of a liberty interest.in due process; a jurisdictional question? 2. Whether the Post-Conviction Courts in Habeas Corpus, abused ; their discretion, denied due process on issues presented of a liberty interest in violation of both constitutional and statutory provision, of continued unlawful confinement? . 3. Whether the Colorado State Supreme Court wrongly denied the Petitioner's Original Jurisdiction presentment deemed a Writ of Habeas Corpus due to a miscommunication to petitioner who filed a briefing before time, refusing to compel respondant to answer _; the claim? And denied a Rehearing, timely filed? I

Docket Entries

2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-09
Waiver of right of respondent Colorado to respond filed.
2018-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2018)

Attorneys

Andrew Lucero
Andrew D. Lucero — Petitioner
Colorado
L. Andrew CooperOffice of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent