Gamada A. Hussein v. Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General, et al.
FourthAmendment Punishment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Whether implanting chips in Petitioner's body and monitoring the Petitioner and Petitioner's family life activities for a decade without warrant and due process of law constitute false imprisonment and violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : A. Whether implanting chips in Petitioner's body and monitoring the Petitioner and Petitioner's family life activities for a decade without warrant and due ; process of law constitute false imprisonment and ; violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. . B. Whether warrantless monitoring of Petitioner's emails, computers, cell phones, and TV for a decade violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States : Constitution. C. Whether Defendants’ persecutions of the Petitioner based on the petitioner's faith, color of skin, political opinions, and country of origin permissible under color of Sovereign Immunity. D. Whether testing the DNA of the Petitioner and Petitioner's family for the sake of research and . profiling violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 1