Whether the Wisconsin Supreme Court erred in upholding the conviction of Quovadis Sanders for violating the Wisconsin statute prohibiting the possession of a firearm by a felon, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Rehaif v. United States

ESTION(S) PRESEN X. TRA Me : Loe \ TEP ~ ae Se o% WALD Con DAM TEER ermcen’s K CorvucddenS Con) os Cowen 2 tte ‘ . nae os . BRL EMS Conducts Bina Reno eno ion Scand amd Ver aman’ de A Rubicon Smack La ison 7 = . ™~ REAL Cooney Gere of GooudsS WecRvoRenl Ghuycisad WSs SSNS sera wher x ee DHS Reon NOY ee toy wand Ske REAM Rav Ge ih of Ces noute ~.0\, Rao Sas NWPeniend of shure Resole PEM ARON BER BLONs, SURV A Socks Munck We CX uae SASS A Sannin seer ey dor Xo Wen SACS Ane ROMO WAC eee coms 2 EE. Wes (Que eM Moner SANS ho edad Ordo Seedron AABB MESS CANA RESEND REN, Wn Se SHER Caveats | GAN Coors Rov Tene Goh RD aeweell RESIN COONY ond Cer Sek CARRY EEED WNC Wn Re CES SENT WEN OF W'S eames Ree Ogeenss een 2 , AYE. TDR SRE Crore OR ROR Cantey BRAT NAH D SEAN Nite © SPTeeNS erst NHL AS Rice COR cams Onc ke Ace RY none Nad, SNE eX me ae See RED NAEERT SED cama SH wennimconts deren? Reso SO ASS, = Ser’ . < esr? conde DY We QED & Wonancsheres Sony” xo Weer SB Ste S eked HLT : Ry Wd Re WERDEN CEN OF PAR EENS TRON SY, poe HAAS ~~ Sod agrninesats SEMEN Gave DH oO ~ On 7, WAS cor beer nd Ms SRE ROIS ee S ~ sed . oe ” ~ < RX QT SLR LS Saw Rann See’ AR REALONE Rt ets Ln Ste SE ~ rebar Se BATA Swe. Ss % < : end oss NS Seon roe WAS Se pRRotede: Gaoork> ~ssoee Sess Vex. rd Loot. i ek coe ok eee CO! No Qrere SEN Cont SNE Cor) MANS ASR : pre tc Ne deanery Sse Sen me Ses he X=> wore Worse see ROO oR Weed SH . . we ¢. — é Re Rew eet . Rd 7% <o egesed Lan Qarwna Vs : QAM HEE Ques SO : ; eo wd ER Dad WYO OM MWrdA Woe arahur > Sow ore eos emmy Soe QE = ereenr’ Iw. . \apertany REBISsoay SHES aS speeds WASTES SH S Bo cord RS of Wee \o . earns Coos SD exeede F ceo SREY HE Se ~eerrdion Sov S “— IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW : [ ] For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at