Pedro Rodriguez v. William D. Gore, Sheriff, San Diego County, California
1. Whether the district court erred in failing to consider Petitioner's claim under the Abstention Doctrine, YOUNGER V HARRIS 401 U.S 37 (1971), Prosecution was taken in bad faith without hope of obtaining a valid conviction, PEREZ V LEDESMA 401 US 82 (1971); Explained in PAREDES V ATHERTON (2000 CA10 COLO) 224 F3rd 1160.
2. Whether the district court erred that petitioner has not exhausted remedy per Title 28 USC S2254 (b)(1), (B) (i)-(ii) and whether extraordinary circumstances exist which would require interference per PHILLIPS V WOODFORD (2001) 267 F3rd 966.
Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted