Whether the Florida Supreme Court erred in its interpretation of Article 3, Section 1 and 2 of the U.S. Constitution regarding the judicial power to disregard unconstitutional statutes

No question identified. : ; : . . Question (s) presented 1. Whether, Article 3, section 1, and 2, of the United States Constitution, on doctrine central to the federal courts structural independence consists of the judicial powers to disregard an unconstitutional | statutes. , . 2. Whether, separation of powers questions, at this is the narrower ground for adjudication of the constitutional questions in the case, because the date, due process submission if correct, might dictate a similar result in a challenge to state federal or constitution law, under the 14th amendment. 3. Whether, the available authority from sister circuit persuades this court that such a result is in fact correct. 4. Whether, the Florida Supreme Court is in conflict with their own rules, and the rules of the United ~ <q States Supreme Courts. 5. Whether, the panel of the Florida Supreme Court conflicts with a decision of the United States Supreme Court or of Court decision of which petition is addressed and with citation of the conflicting case or cases consideration by full court is therefore necessary to secure and maintain uniformity of courts decisions. 6. Whether, the lower courts, stands for the position that there is final agency conduct and appealment will be allowed a judicial review under purely legal and decisions making of abusive of powers to their : conduct. 7. Whether, the lower courts has duty to not discriminate under 42 U.S.C. section 1985, and purposely : discriminate by violating petitioner civil right that is federally protected. : 8. Whether, this Supreme Court, wants this Supreme Court to act if it were considering the questions for —the first time affording no deference to the decisions of lower Judges and its legal decisions of lower court on questions of laws are reviewed using this standard. \ ig