No. 18-6202
Amil Dinsio v. Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure court-mandate discretion due-process federal-courts judicial-discretion legal-review mandate mandate-recall motion-denial recall standing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Second Circuit Court abuse its discretion when it denied the Petitioner's motion to recall the Court's mandate?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did the Second Circuit Court abuse its discretion when it denied the Petitioner’s motion to recall the Court’s mandate? See Exhibit B 2. Did the Federal District Court Judge Glenn T. Suddaby attempt to cover up for the five Appellate Division justices stealing the Petitioner’s original CPLR Article 78 and its $315.00 filing fee when stated in
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judical Department to respond filed.
2018-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2018)
Attorneys
Amil Dinsio
Amil Dinsio — Petitioner
Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judical Department
Robert M. Goldfarb — New York State Attorney General's Office, Respondent