No. 18-6229
Josh A. Wairi v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review booker-standard booker-v-united-states criminal-appeal criminal-sentencing first-circuit-court-of-appeals gall-v-united-states judicial-discretion procedural-reasonableness sentencing-guidelines united-states-v-josh-wairi
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-11-02
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the First Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in petitioner's case conflict with this Court's decisions in Booker v. United States and Gall v. United States which held that criminal sentences must be procedurally reasonable?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED : 1. Does the First Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in petitioner's case conflict with this Court's decisions in Booker v. United States, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) and Gall v. United : States, 552 U.S. 38 (200?) which held, inter alia, that criminal sentences must be procedurally reasonable? CITATION . United States v. Josh Wairi, No. 15-2166(1st Cir. May 30, 2018)(Slip Opinion), A true copy, attached, at
Docket Entries
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-09
Motion (18M43) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
2018-09-12
MOTION (18M43) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-08-28
Motion (18M43) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2018-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent