Darryl Johnson v. United States
HabeasCorpus
Was Petitioner's guilty plea sustained in violation of due process warranting habeas relief
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Was Petitioner's guilty plea sustained in violation of due process warranting habeas relief where the district court failed to advise the petitioner correctly to terms of what appeal right's he was waving? Was counsel's (three at that) constitutionally ineffective because they misadvised petitioner that he was waving his sentencing and conviction right's, and failed to object _ to the confusing and vague grammatical text in the plea agreement? Did the courts below commit reversible error denying Johnson's §2255 motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing to resolve the factual disputes? Whether the court of appeals for the second circuit err by not applying the correct standard of review when jurists of reason could have debated the issues presented herein? Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals err when it did not review de novoly the district court's interpretation of a contract, the plea in Mr. Johnson case?