No. 18-6241

Edward Jewell v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: class-precedent constitutional-challenge controlled-substance-offense criminal-law direct-appeal due-process mathis-precedent mathis-v-united-states sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation united-states-sentencing-commission
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2018-11-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does this Court's holding in Mathis v United States apply to determinations under the United States Sentencing Guidelines of whether a prior conviction is a 'controlled substance offense'?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED * Does this Court's holding in Mathis v United States apply to determinations ° under the United States Sentencing Guidelines of Whether a prior conviction ‘ is a "controlled substance offense"? : ; * Does this Court's holding in Class v. United States entitle Petitioner ‘ to challenge the constitutionality of the Statute of conviction on . Direct Appeal? — ; , {

Docket Entries

2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2018)

Attorneys

Edward Jewell
Edward Jewell — Petitioner
Edward Jewell — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent