Whether secondary evidence discovered as a result of an illegal search and seizure can constitute proof against the victim of search, and does exclusionary prohibition extend to the indirect products of such invasion?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1, Whether secondary evidence discovered as a result of an illegal search and seizure can constitute proof against the victim of search, and does exclusionary prohibition extend to the indirect products of such invasion? . Wong Sun. v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963) 2. Whether the exclusionary rule must be applied to all cases involving issues in the context of a Fourth Amendment violation when facts of case has established a violation of the Fourth Amendment occurred? California v. Minjares, 443 U.S. 916 (1979) 3. Whether an illegal arrest that lead to a warrantless search and evidence is discovered, can the illegally seized evidence be admissible to give probable cause . to make the arrest valid after the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments are violated? Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 (1979) 4. Whether independent review is an obligation for state appellate courts to maintain control of and to clarify the legal principles in question once the historical facts of case and law are established to determine whether the facts satisfy the relevant statutory or Constitutional standards when the rule of law as applied to the established facts is violated? Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996) 5. Whether the Sixth Amendment provides Prison Release Reoffender (PRR) act must be submitted to a jury and found beyond a reasonable doubt to increase the mandatory minimum sentence? Alleyne v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 2151(2013) ii