Dennis Martin v. Oklahoma, et al.
Whether the state court erred in dismissing the petitioner's habeas corpus petition as untimely under the state's statute of limitations
No question identified. : (()what Au© ue ™ TION(S) PRESENTED Whew f pagent fn hg do Sank tdoKe~ ; state PRIt0 WKAR Ls hechy Stedly D45-08 <0 33 yahes -Onfote,— hia i PRiton fod wits ween Ake stro faite, oat thet he Stabe conat her gio Seca NN eg, we al fue wud (2)1s & ABU«K pe prsckcatron TO PAK A Cee HOF OF AipKalLa 8) tity witha. pug Cho cese or BAKA WL ? (3)Whaw vax. Stee ca mote Feo Duce -a Recon oF A Patton Athest, BO PhD CMOIWG preparer hnetills Pixd _ LOMAS ORL SLAP ok MWe ell De Sea Be” 0 wheat rns 18 punrianle Fe Jer Fo SAKIC [ULAEX Rape fe Ww fh a) os : Habs Ghia Wz aA CHCA tthe A FO Leute ® Z .