Johnny Kirkland v. Progressive Insurance Company, et al.
Whether Raymond Lofer vs Wonton, and Negligence
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (\3 \nhelher “Raymond Lofer \n0s Wonton, and Nae gence. (DAihedber Th antas a resal @4 Avigh ko accept ProWerd adonssible evidence NOt he ganhng DL Mhe woton ta Liraine, dhol Senes Qs jhe posic Lor TenerSible Err. TA IWaS BISO PIE WAAL ANA CAVSING We Nok-Xo Hove % COP er Lee fol. (3) WWhedbher MY CVI\ Rights Were Violated (1 Whether Myeir as O Right +o Counsel. (S) Whether herr Was & DVe Process Wi'olahon in denied Wye Tighsvo Ava\ by ry oy Qanhig We dafendank mokon for Direck Verdict when MY Gdmrssible evidence IQs AWweady bared by a , Mibion fa Lienine when Verh Was & Genuine iSsve gf Lock So be pleented Ao She Wry?