Roy Parker v. Burl Cain, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Did the petitioner receive effective assistance of counsel?
No question identified. : QUESTLON(S) PRESENTED 1). Did Petitioner receive the effective assistance of counsel ay guaranteed by the 6” Amendment to the United States Constitution when tnal counsel allawed the court to proceed without aruling on the Petitioner's competency being established? 2). it trial counsel acting within the effectiveness of assistance of coungel when he does not afford his client an opportunity to testify, when the client has an absolute right to testify and wants to? 3). Can trial counge] be effective to his client when there is an actual conflict of interest axiciing between the counsel and cltent? 4). Was Petitioner effectively denied the right to prove that ineffective assistance of counsel existed when the Courts continuously denied an evidentiary hearing? ‘ 2