Whether the isolated alleged incidents of constitutional violations in Plaintiff's § 1983 claims, which are founded on the actions of non-state actors, are legally sufficient to establish a municipal custom or practice' as held by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I.Whether the isolated alleged incidents of constitutional violations in Plaintiff's § 1983 claims, which are founded on the actions of non-state actors, are legally sufficient to establish a municipal “custom or practice” as held by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. II. Whether the Eleventh Circuit’s theory that the jury disbelieved witness testimony to the contrary constitutes sufficient evidence to support the Plaintiff's burden of proof, in the absence of affirmative evidence supporting Plaintiff's claim.