Whether a district court magistrate acts in excess of her discretion and outside the bounds of reason during the initial screening of a pro-se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 if she engages in a deliberate pattern and/or practice of repeatedly misconstruing, misrepresenting and misstating the pro-se petitioner's statements in a deceitful manner in order to then recommend that the sufficiently stated claims of violation of federal civil rights meriting habeas corpus relief be unfairly denied and dismissed

ESTIONS PRESENTES 1, WHETHER) A Disraicr Cover MAGISTRATE ACTS IN Excess OF Hea Dacktrions And oorsiRE THE AODNAS OF REASON DOURING THE INITIAL SCREENING OF.THE PLEADING FoR A. PETHIOd FOR WRT OF HAAEAS CORPUS ONdER 2H V.5.C @ 2241 DF, Wittoot Conducrne an Evlbtntiak? HEARING THE ; MAGISTRATE ENTERS FindinGS oF cacr THAT ARE Not SOPPoRTED BI THE RECORD, NoR ANYTHING tHe MAGISTRATE COULd HAVE LEMANEL DORE THE PROCEEDINGS Bot) RATHER THE Findings ARE Aased on WHAT. CLEARLY. AND ORATCHVE LY APPEAR TO RE PERSomAL ExTRATUNCIAL Fixed deLErS, TDEALS . Anda con aécresRES THAT Love NO SoMAT FROM NEITHER THE PETIMONERES PLEADING NOR THE RES Pow DENTS Answer. ? 2, Werden A Disrecr Courr MAGISTRATE AcTSiiN AN EXCESS of HER DSCRENON ANd ooTsIDE THE BOUNDS OF REASON Done . THE IAUITIAL SCREEMAG OF Ai: PROSE. PLEANING “Fo: A! PENTON For WET OF HAAERS ComPuS UMdER 16 U.S.C. § 224 IF SHE WERE TD ENGAGE WW & DEuacRatc PATTERN AMv/oR PRacnce OF REAcATEDLY MisconsTRuie , MISREPRESENTING ANd Missrarivh THE PRo-<e PETITION ERs STATEMENTS And in. A DECEITFUL MANNER Int ORDER W THEN: RECCOMEND. THAT THE SUFEICIENTL? STATED CLAIMS OF ViotaArion OF FENERAL_CWwle RIGHTS |: MERETING HABEAS CaRPuS REUEF To RE UNFALALY DENIC AND Digmisven? +: DF THe ANswte TO THE A®ove Questions t$ YES THEN, ul e 2. WHETHER THOSE ACTIONS, PATTERS , Mert ods AndbR PRACTICES DEscerAEd ABOVE, IN Cavesnion 4 aad 2), tr TREY NGRE TO BE odsecriVELT Stein TO HAVE. .TAKEN) PLACE. On REWALF OF A MaGisreave, Tudce And/oRk TRIBUNAL In & WRIT o&€ HAdEAS CorPus Anmd/oR Todiciar PRocee dine. Cj +C. EWvetinG FIvdiNds OF FACY BASED oN ExTRAZUMUAL PERSONAL Fixed Beners, DEAS OR Conxecrvecs THAT ARE UNSUPPORTED BY tHE Recaras (oR) mis REPRESENT ING ) PAISSTATING AND rtisco nsTROING Facts IN ® Necerrue mansce) luovtd 7 BRE sTRanc Evidence oF AlAs, PARTAUTY AND PRexvaICE THAT Wood Reeorke TodiciAL MsQoaurication ANN REcosML FRawt A CASE, Ss Peciauy iF IN Every INSTANCE THAT . Such Canbuers. OCLuR iT. CLEARLY APPEARS TO ONLI. RE IN FAVOR oF THE RESPaWDENT AND PRESDCIALOR ANTAGONIsric, TOWARDS A PRO-SE INNEENT PettronER® Tr me ANSWER YO Question 3 anove is YER. Then? . 4, Werther, me MAGisrRaATE THAT Conducred THE Inia , ScREEWWE OF THE PRO-SE PETITION FoR UWIRiT OF Haeag CORPUS IN THE DesrRicr Couar APPEARS 1O HAVE ENGAGE) AnS USED. Suc “ACTIONS yPRITERNS MerHods Wwi/oe PRacnces DESCRIBED Atave inv C aueertoni 4 “+HROUGH 3) and . THAT Waold HAVE REAsonAaLY REQUIRED. Avdraar Récusar And MS AUALIECATION Feam tHe Case 2 , iti 3. WHETHER EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES OF GREAT, IMMEDIATE IRREPARADLE DAMAGES WittN THE MEANING OF YounGee Vs HARRIS 401 U.S. 279 C985), THAT MERITS ExcemPTiIoN FROM THE GENERAL APPLICATION oF THE RuLE OF ABSTENTION, MAT BE DEMONSTRATED IF AND WHEN A PRESENTENCED / PRE-comviCTION STATE INPAATE HAS ALLEGED AND SHOWN IN A 28 U.S.C. & 2241 Perttion FoR WRT OF WAREAS CoRPus THAT HE HAS BEEN Awd WiLL LIKELY Continue TO BE PREVENTED AND DEPRIVED FRom AN. ObdEctWELY MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY TO SET uP, PREPARE PRESENT AMY RELY aN A Conflere And EFFECTIVE CRIMMAL DEFENSE INCLUNNG BENG REPRVED ANN PRevenTEN FRom Raising ANN PRESENTING FEDERAL CONSTITOTIONAL Clvit RIGHTS VIOLATIONSCLAIMS LN THE TRIAL Coury OF THE Srate IN ORDER TO PRESERVE SUCH Claims FOR A DiREer APREAL And TO ExHaust AdNUNISTRATIVE REMEDIES AS REQUIRED BY THE RULES OF Cortit7, AN) AS The DiReer REsucT OF WIDESPREAD SYSTE Micy STRUCTONL, | AND) IWVSTITOTIONAL VIOLATIONS AND DEPRvariIOW oe FIFTH) — SOcTH AND Four TEENtTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS oF THE UNITED STATES CanSTitetion THAT Have BEEN TAKING Place DuRwe Mote THAN FIFE EARS Juang HE PENDING STATE PRasecurten ° G. WHETHER \ AAD FAITH AND HARASSMENT OFFICIAL , ~ LAWLESSiNESS| THAT WOULD. MERIT ExCEMPTION FROM THE . GENERAL APPLICATION of THE RULE OF ABSTENTION Winmel THE MEANING. 8 Younger Ve HARRIS 401 Us5274 C1485 ) r IV 1 ||May fe DemonsrRATED WHEN & PRe-Senrenced — PREeconvicTed 2 || DETAINEE AWATING TRALIN A PENDING STATE PROSECOTION HAS ALLEGED 3 ||AND DeMonsrear