Whether the Georgia Supreme Court erred in dismissing the Petitioner's application for certificate of probable cause because the Petitioner did not file an indigent affidavit prior to filing the application

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED " Georgia Supreme Court dismissed Appli cation for Cerhificate of Prebable. cquse because thein Chen did vot Bip it March H, 20/3, retary (eo petitio den St0b} nq ve’ ‘Needed fo add indigent afftiay ie before She Could Fi fe Gra SoCt Se 13 Me Howtuery , Ga. SCt. StotaLory Fitting Rule Ci) States, Application Lor Pre se Présower are . Nok repaired to provide indigent oftidauit Pp they are ivcarcegated and UNRepresent by counsel when they frie Cpe application, 4.1 S, icine Court of Appea(s i+ reeuired +o conduct a Factual determination of the disbefet Court's records and Petitfowents pleading When he cov ded Froud aNd misre presentation WAS Committed on the distmet Count which eesulted in baring ceyiew of his coustttu Howal Claims ? ged a. Did the disteict Count abuse its discretion dismissing peetowers 24 us. 9 A2SY petition without aking Qa Lactual determination on CAL contents oF misrepeesentaton aud fraud committtd aw the Court which resulfed iN the disunssin of Petihioner's Federal petihan on a vord ordeoF Gar Sit, deny teusew of petibiower’s Conshiilldjoval Clqims 2 . 3. Whew 0 Clenk impedes or interferes with fodicéal pleading causing untirtely Filing that bans He state and federal review pebibowen’s Cowstitutioval Claims, does the Clerk Violates petitiowen’s Covstitubioual procedural Due Process Cr’ghts fq access to the court ? ? i”