No. 18-6270
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-protection criminal-procedure defendant-rights double-jeopardy double-jeopardy,criminal-procedure,constitutional- due-process mistrial retrial trial-procedure
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess
FifthAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2018-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a state, consistent with the protections of the Double Jeopardy Clause, try a defendant a second time when the first trial ended in a mistrial which was not manifestly necessary and that was declared over the specific and personal objection of the defendant?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED May a state, consistent with the protections of the Double Jeopardy Clause, try a defendant a second time when the first trial ended in a mistrial which was not manifestly necessary and that was declared over the specific and personal objection of the defendant? ii
Docket Entries
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-23
Waiver of right of respondent Ohio to respond filed.
2018-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 9, 2018)
Attorneys
Cornelius Lynch
Jeffrey M. Gamso — Petitioner