Whether state courts are following what the legislators have put in place

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1, Whether state courts are following what the legislators have put in place ; through the statutes? Have the legislators put Statutes in place for : reasoning to be interpreted correctly and carried out wholeheartedly and in that This Court is obligated and is demanded upon to act accordingly within the confines of The Constitution when state courts do not act within the boundary writings from This Court in similar cases and of what state legislators have incorporated? 2. Whether This Courts wisdom through their opinions are being adhered too in , their citing’s and all the while an innocent bystander has been harmed? This Court’s rulings’ in numerous citing’s have been abolished and This Court in the process has been made a mockery of and put on the back burners so as other courts can deviate and travel their own path? 3. Whether “costs” will continue to accrue towards petitioner in his pursuit for ; obedience of the Orders and should the nonprofit corporation “shall pay the ; _ member’s costs incurred to obtain the ORDERS” which have NEVER been | produced since 2013? _——C.R.S. 7-136-104(3)(a) . U.S. Supreme CourtPetitioner's Writ of CertiorariRK v. CRAMRAPage 2 of 42 4. ** Whether or not two (2) COURT ORDERS deserve to be adhered too? 5. Whether discrimination and prejudice has been applied against a Pro se litigant who was pronounced the “Prevailing Party”? 6. Whether there has been a misapplication of the Rule of Laws in all the cases. compiled into this case within the same claims? (6 cases) 7. Whether a prevailing party deserves the benefits associated with the law? ; 8. Whether the Constitution of the United States applies equally to all? 9. Whether a Court of Appeals has distracted and made excuses from Trial ORDER’s in the process towards the disobedient party? 10. Whether a pro se litigant even stands the hands of time in its journey for Justice when not having counsel to represent him or the legal competence and full understanding of the process to withstand all the appeals and such? 11. Whether This Court has a duty to protect its citizens from the core of our existence through the Judicial process when a prevailing party has now U.S. Supreme CourtPetitioner’s Writ of CertiorariRK v. CRAMRAPage 3 of 42 become the victim? 12. Whether The RECORD should be complete in order to reference to on appeals as it was not in this case even after Notice was given with explicit missing documents/filings? ; ; 13. Even though not a controversial case, doesn’t This Court by its power through the Constitution have the obligation to protect a citizen? U.S. Supreme CourtPetitioner’s Writ of CertiorariRK v. CRAMRAPage 4 of 42