Whether establishing that requested expert services are reasonably necessary to the representation under 18 U.S.C. § 3599 requires articulation of a constitutional claim as a matter of law?

QUESTION PRESENTED qd) Whether establishing that requested expert services are reasonably necessary to the representation under 18 U.S.C. § 3599 requires articulation of a constitutional claim as a matter of law? (2) Whether it is an abuse of discretion to deny requested expert services under 18 U.S.C. § 3599 when the services are intended to inform counsel about the implications of a forensic development as to DNA evidence, which the State relied on at trial and has since disclosed was false? ii