No. 18-6289
IFP
Tags: and justice from incarceration civil-rights due-process ex-post-facto incarceration justice liberty civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-sentencing cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process equal-protection ex-post-facto ex-post-facto-law incarceration justice-system legal-application sentencing
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the retroactive application of an ex post facto law that enhances a criminal sentence violates the constitutional rights to freedom, liberty, and justice from incarceration
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : | ___Guestonisy theseated Wan thee of rill canal igh | Eyal application of ano pu Fac bos th enhance my | KentenceS Ween te sale of Hoda: deny oem consTrchond]. _ {to freedoon ,libecly and yustice from iacarcertion baseel | haan egal application of an &x post fock awe . . LISTOF PARTIES oe 7 { ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on. the cover page. . { ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. Alist of all
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2018)
Attorneys
Bruce L. Small
Bruce L. Small — Petitioner