Steven H. Cook v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Is the issue of great import to potentially thousands of prisoners similarly situated and does it have significant impact on the public?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED *ls the issue! {accordingly of great import to potentially thousand’s of prisoners similarly _ Situated and does if have significant impact on the public. *Does the Federal Mail box Rule exist as a matter of federal law, and florida law? ‘Was the eleventh cir. wrong to deny a C.O.A. when it was clear from the record that petitioner had been denied due process under the 5" and 14 amendment by the trial court erroneous denial of 3.850 collateral review? : *After the 11" Cir. granted a C.O.A. and issued a “vacate and remand” to the middle district with the opinion that 1. The petition (2254) was timely filed, and 2. The R. 3.850 motion issue claimed in the petition was also timely filed under the Federal Mail Box Rule, was the middle district wrong for misconstruing the issue and grounds of the petition as being from a R. 9.140 for ineffective “appellate” counsel rather than the appropriate R. 3.850 motion claimed in the petition? (doc. 35 mid. Dist.) ; *For the purpose of the due process clause does the process of law for the “deprivation of liberty” comprise all procedures including collateral review procedures that establish : and review the validity of a conviction?