No. 18-63

Steve K. Wilson Briggs v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights copyright copyright-claims copyright-law court-procedure due-process free-speech intellectual-property internet-guidelines legal-precedent patent precedent standing
Key Terms:
Copyright
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether by failing to clarify and update internet-access-guidelines, U.S. courts imperil the rights of U.S. intellectual-property-owners

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. Whether by failing to clarify and update internet widespread dissemination access guidelines, U.S. courts imperil the rights of U.S. intellectual property owners. _ 2. Whether a decision based on the falsified report of a man who later confessed on FOX News that he was a “fixer” for President Clinton, can stand and set U.S. copyright precedent. ) ; 3. Whether a ruling that ignores superseding law, to base itself in subordinate law, can be valid. _ 4. Whether a plaintiff has the right to state his own copyright claims, or if the ; court has authority to omit and substantially alter a plaintiff's claims?

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-20
Waiver of right of respondents Neill Blomkamp, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.; Tristar Pictures, Inc.; Media Rights Capital II, L.P.; Qed International LLC to respond filed.
2018-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 10, 2018)

Attorneys

Neill Blomkamp, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.; Tristar Pictures, Inc.; Media Rights Capital II, L.P.; Qed International LLC
Michael J. KumpKinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert LLP, Respondent
Steve K. Wilson Briggs
Steve K. Wilson Briggs — Petitioner