Whether the Defendant's rights under Article III, Section 2, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment were violated when the Defendant is induced to enter a plea agreement where government errors in the Rule 11 plea hearing generate ambiguity regarding the drug quantity and drug type and create confusion regarding the consequences of his plea?

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Defendant’s rights under Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution for the trial of his crimes by jury in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution not to be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself; and under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury and to be confronted with the witnesses against him, were violated when the Defendant is induced to enter a plea agreement where government errors in the Rule 11 plea hearing generate ambiguity regarding the drug quantity and drug type and create confusion regarding the consequences of his plea?