When reviewing a claim of gender discrimination in violation of J.E.B. v. Alabama, is comparative juror analysis appropriate even where the male and female comparators are not identical in all respects?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When reviewing a claim of gender discrimination in violation of J.E.B. v. Alabama, is comparative juror analysis appropriate even where the male and female comparators are not identical in all respects? 2. Where the prosecution proffers gender-neutral reasons for its strikes and disavows reliance on other reasons, should the reviewing court consider the gender-neutral reasons given for the strikes instead of the reasons that have been disavowed? 3. Where the petitioner has raised her claim of jury discrimination via a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, does the petitioner establish prejudice if she can show that, had the J.E.B. v. Alabama objection been made, it would have been granted? i