No. 18-6329
Adan Sandoval Dominguez v. M. Eliot Spearman, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: competency competency-standard constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process factual-understanding judicial-standard major-depressive-disorder mental-competency mental-health rational-understanding standing trial-rights
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did defendant meet the competency requirement to stand trial set forth in Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (1993)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did defendant meet the competency requirement to stand trial set forth in Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (1993), which states a defendant must have “sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding” and must have “a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him” in spite of defendant’s diagnosis of major depressive disorder? i TABLE ON CONTENTS CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS. 0... cece cece ttc tteeneeteee
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent M. Eliot Spearman, Warden to respond filed.
2018-10-10
Attorneys
Adan Sandoval Dominguez
Young Joon Kim — Federal Public Defenders Office, Petitioner
Young Joon Kim — Federal Public Defenders Office, Petitioner