Whether the District Court of Appeals erred in dismissing petitioner's claim

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ah the pst Disteicl Count 0 Clpesl Lkepentor ent” from He essttinl doduidorbsst OF law 43 (ntwdate Ly te united Hides Segnems yhe Coast mustmike . Aw wXphess tiudivg that petitioveh boul $6 [bsgen Bavett Tom Ye prapose of thé wut fal Ot fe dole pct phion Ta inp psing BH Ault NeseTean, Whew he pecond 's Jsholy yyill of Such, hat pul Ge of gheate public jnpehtavce Ter & gon bt ferro — To Ae bewitch Due Yhoces’, ap. Jeuhutil te kh Oyear Seatfensce Berponch he Miitteny ala, Absenuce 2QUil Statonrtst Lodten he aan SA toed Copch inl Out PO CBS'S Tientin—_ oo fi