No. 18-6333
William Staples v. Claude Maye, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fraud fraudulent-declaration habeas-corpus legal-procedure prison-officials standing sworn-declaration
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Staples Due Process complied with by the prison officials?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) WAS Staples Due Process complied with by the prison Officials? 2) Was there a complete return to the Writ of Habeas Corpus from the prison officials? , 3) Was there a fraudulent Sworn declaration submitted by the prison officials? . i , NO. ee emnee nen LIST GF PARTIES {X] ALL parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ; di sas OF CONTENTS | OPINIONS BELOW cc od _ JURISDICTION ; CONSTIESUTEONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED v
Docket Entries
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-22
Waiver of right of respondent Claude Maye, Warden to respond filed.
2018-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2018)
Attorneys
Claude Maye, Warden
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent