No. 18-6341
John William Lieba, II v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review burden-of-proof criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidence jury legal-standard standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether sufficient evidence existed to convict Mr. Lieba?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER, SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE EXISTED TO CONVICT MR. LIEBA? ii
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2018)
Attorneys
John Lieba
Robert Henry Branom Jr. — Federal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
Robert Henry Branom Jr. — Federal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent